Friday, August 28, 2009

My Cash for Your Clunker

The "Cash for Clunkers" program is over and the official line is that it was a smashing success. 690,114 "gas guzzlers" were traded in for new, more efficient vehicles. $2.88 billion of taxpayer money financed the program. A program that was supposed to last until the end of November spent $1 billion in the first week and was over in a month.
The fact that the government takes money from one taxpayer to give to someone else is not new. It happens all the time as taxpayer money is redistributed to favor a targeted group. However, this time with the Cash for Clunkers program it has rarely been so blatant to take taxpayer dollars to favor certain groups. The intent was to get "gas guzzlers" off the road and replace them with more fuel efficient vehicles. This was the intent of the liberal green lobby's devout wish to scrap every pickup truck and SUV (unless it's their own). Secondly, the program was designed to help the car dealers, car companies and let's not forget the overpaid, under worked UAW members. This is in addition to the over $60 billion of taxpayer money that has already been spent on GM and Chrysler.
There were certain rules that had to be followed. The car/truck had to get less than 18 miles to the gallon. If you bought a vehicle that got at least 10 mpg more then you got a $4,500 benefit. If only 2 mpg more then you got $3,500. Why the discrepancy? The geniuses who wrote this legislation realized that GM and Chrysler, especially Chrysler, made very few vehicles that got better than 28 mpg. But they did offer a lot of big SUV and trucks that could meet a vastly lowered standard of 2 mpg improvement. In other words without the lower requirement both GM and Chrysler would have hardly benefited from the program because they didn't offer enough vehicles to qualify. Furthermore, the trade-ins, no matter the condition, had to be scrapped.
The results are in and surprise, eight out of the top ten sellers were cars made by Japanese and Korean companies. Only two Ford products were in the top ten. If fact, about 60% of the new vehicles sold were made by foreign car companies. Moreover, as is often the case with a government program that is ill conceived and hastily put together, the rules and paperwork were horrendous. Most car dealers have yet to be paid, the paperwork demands were enormous and the rules were insanely complicated. (And we want the government to take over health care?) As expected, most of the vehicles traded in were trucks and SUVs thereby appeasing the enviromentalists. However there were also a lot of new trucks and SUVs that were sold with engines that got slightly better mileage, though not much, than the trade-in. Even so, Chrysler sold the fewest new cars and trucks of anybody.
Several comments from Duffy about the Cash for Clunkers program.
1) If you see your neighbor with a new small car when he used to have a large pickup, think of your tax dollars at work .
2) Almost 700,000 cars were sold in one month. Wait for the cries of anguish from the car dealers the next 3 months when nobody buys anything.
3) How many perfectly good used cars and trucks will really be scrapped? Many will, but more than a few will end up being resold on the black market, shipped to South America, or be torn down for parts.
4) Watch for articles in the press (which the Administration will try to suppress) of how many people who bought new cars will not be able to make the car payments and have their vehicles repossessed.
Just another example of the Obama administration and Congress deciding to favor certain groups over others by using your taxpayer dollars. Rarely have I seen anything so blatant and unfair, but I fear this will become a common occurrence with this Administration.

Friday, August 21, 2009

What Obama should have said to the NAACP

About a month ago President Obama gave a speech on the 100th anniversary of the NAACP. Unfortunately, the news media barely covered the speech but by all accounts it was a great speech. As I understand, the speech was broken into two parts, the first part was pretty much boilerplate, "We have accomplished a lot, we still have a long ways to go, etc." About what you would expect to this group. The second half of the speech was more along the lines of, " quit playing the race card, go to school, work hard, stay out of trouble, etc." The type of speech that Bill Cosby gives to black groups.

In my opinion this is what he should have said, "Let me express my honor at being the first African-American president to address the NAACP on it's 100th anniversary. But, actually I'm not, strictly speaking, an African- American. True, my father was born in Kenya, in Africa, but he never became an American. My white mother was born in Kansas and I was born in Hawaii. I consider myself, therefore, as simply an "American", period. Just like millions of other bi-racial folks who were born and live in the United States.

I feel now is the time for this country to do away with hyphenated labels for our citizens. There are no more Irish-Americans, German-Americans, Italian-Americans or Jewish-Americans. Those terms have faded from history. Hispanic is a term that means folks who speak Spanish. But there is no such thing as an Hispanic race. I believe it is past time for this country to stop labeling each other as to who belongs to a race, tribe or clan. This causes divisiveness, strife and misunderstandings. We are all Americans and should look past each other's color, religion or customs as I know so many people do today. But, far too many still put labels on folks who for whatever reason, are "not like themselves."

The 2010 census is next year. As president I am going to issue an Executive Order that all mention of race, color and religion will be eliminated on census forms. From now on I will refer to myself and my family as simply "American" instead of "African-American", a label that strictly speaking, doesn't apply to me anyway. Furthermore, I will order that there will be no more references to race, color or religion in any official correspondence of the United States government. This applies to every employee of the Federal government.

I know most of you will be outraged at this proposal and declare me naive at best and sinister at worst. But my guess is that many, many Americans will finally say they have a President who declares firmly the time for racism is past in this country. It is my firm hope that all race based organizations, of all types, will become irrelevant in the not to distant future.

Thank you for your attention on this historic occasion.